Cases 41 - 50 of 164,085
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brooks v. East Atlanta Cardiology, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02567
Plaintiff:
Anna Brooks
Defendant:
East Atlanta Cardiology, LLC, Nirvana Aestheticvs and Wellness, LLC and Muthayyah Srinivasan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lawyer v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02558
Plaintiff:
Karan Monee Lawyer
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whittle v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02566
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lynn Whittle
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Uhlig, LLC v. Privo Corporation
as 1:2024mi00048
Plaintiff:
Uhlig, LLC
Defendant:
Privo Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
