Social Security Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 9,169
Shepardson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: Deborah A Shepardson
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00466
Plaintiff: Eric L Miller
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Pizer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: Jennifer L Pizer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
CLEMONS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff: ASHLEIGH JO CLEMONS
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roudebush v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff: Heather A. Roudebush
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stiles v Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY K STILES
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Warner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff: Jennifer L Warner
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CLARK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff: JERRY W. CLARK, JR.
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MORRIS MOSS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: DEMANZIO LAMONT MORRIS MOSS
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MONTGOMERY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff: CATHY L. MONTGOMERY
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?