Cases 51 - 60 of 9,169
Chaja v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Autumn L. Chaja
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanchez Morales v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Aileen Sanchez Morales
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Curtis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
James K. Curtis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wadkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dayna M Wadkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dell Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Richard Dell Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
SANQUENETTI v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
SAUNSERRA CHEYENNE SANQUENETTI
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JOHNSON v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HUGHES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
RON N HUGHES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCHAEFER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE S. SCHAEFER
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Kratzman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Wendy S Kratzman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
