Cases 1 - 10 of 4,213
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dillon-Marlin et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Demari Dillon-Marlin and Erik Dillon
Defendant:
Josh M. Lee, Clayton Farnes and Unified Police Department Greater Salt Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Brunner v. Thompson et al
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Brunner
Defendant:
J. Thompson, FNU Cox, FNU Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brunner v. Utah County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Brunner
Defendant:
Utah County Sheriff's Office and Mike Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Muir v. Springville City et al
as 2:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Steven Donnell Muir
Defendant:
Springville City, Springville Police Department, Lance Haight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
