Cases 1 - 10 of 19,102
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savalli v. Gulledge
as 4:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Ryan Douglas Savalli
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Gulledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Garcia v. Henson
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garcia
Defendant:
Officer J. Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Gwinnett County Police et al
as 1:2024cv02067
Plaintiff:
Kirk Michael Fields
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Police, Officer Bishop, Officer Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodard v. Dix
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Timothy Woodard
Defendant:
Sheriff Darrell Dix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Hydrick et al
as 1:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Judge Stacey K. Hydrick, P.D. Scott W. DePlonty, Judge Courtney L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargreaves v. House
as 4:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Chad Hargreaves
Respondent:
Brian House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kengne v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01991
Petitioner:
Raissa Djuissi Kengne
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail, Sheriff Patrick Labat, The State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
