US District Court for the District of Maine Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,138
SOSTAK v. DAPRATO et al
as 2:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
RYAN SOSTAK
Not Classified By Court:
DEREK DAPRATO
Defendant:
DAPRATO FAMILY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCCASLIN v. STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 2:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH MCCASLIN
Defendant:
STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS, TROOPER RICHARDSON and UNIDENTIFIED MASSACHUSETTS FEMALE OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MERRILL v. MOSHER et al
as 2:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
SERENA MERRILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JODEE MOSHER MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
TAIT et al v. LAKE REGION SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2023cv00329
Defendant:
JESSICA DAGGETT, LAKE REGION SCHOOL DISTRICT doing business as MSAD 61, ALAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
AMY C TAIT and Christopher L Strecker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLE et al v. SIG SAUER INC
as 1:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
DAVID COLE and KIMBERLY COLE
Defendant:
SIG SAUER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TAMAKI v. TAMAKI
as 2:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE TAMAKI
Defendant:
ATSUSHI TAMAKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GALLANT v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GALLANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HORR v. BAMD INC
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
TORY HORR
Defendant:
BAMD INC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
FRANCK v. LEWISTON VA CLINIC et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANCK
Defendant:
LEWISTON VA CLINIC, DOREEN HUNT, EDWARD STEELE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
DOHERTY v. UNITED AIRLINES INC
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOHERTY
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
