Tenth Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 608
Drew v. United States Postal Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00900
Plaintiff: Courtney S Drew
Defendant: United States Postal Service, Thomas J Blum, Bernadette Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Terrazas Ortega v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2023cv00873
Plaintiff: Gloria Terrazas Ortega
Defendant: Ur Jaddou and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lands et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2023cv00869
Plaintiff: Marianna Lands and Charles William Paynter
Defendant: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Deanne Criswell and Angela Gladwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Children's Hospital Colorado v. United States Department of Defense et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02561
Plaintiff: Children's Hospital Colorado
Defendant: United States Department of Defense, Lloyd Austin III, in his capacity as Secretary of Defense and Lloyd Austin, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Aero Tech, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior
as 2:2023cv00726
Plaintiff: Aero Tech, Inc.
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dalton, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4107
Plaintiff / Appellant: ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Plaintiff: GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner: GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Garfield County, Utah, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4106
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner: GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Corbett v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv00509
Plaintiff: KARLY RAE CORBETT
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Quezada Aguina et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2023cv00647
Plaintiff: Maria Tayde Quezada Aguina and Ramon Socorro Urbina Morquecho
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, Ur Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. United States Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff: Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, United States Bureau of Land Management and Laura Daniel Davis
Intervenor: Peak Minerals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?