Tenth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 44,095
The Reading Truck Group LLC v. Bret Steel et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
The Reading Truck Group LLC
Defendant:
Bret Steel and Custom Truck One Source, Inc.
United States v. Franklin
as 24-3066
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE FRANKLIN, JR.
Frericks v. MSPB, et al
as 24-9531
Petitioner:
LONNIE FRERICKS
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. U.S. Forest Service, et al
as 24-1187
Petitioner:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Respondent:
U.S. FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, WAYNE BROWN, JERRY BROWN and others
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd.
Defendant:
Raul Torres and Stephanie Schardin Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United Energy Workers Healthcare, LLC v. Cavallaro et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
United Energy Workers Healthcare, LLC
Defendant:
Natalie Cavallaro and Nuclear Worker Solutions, LLC
Pierce et al v. Jardine Construction Co et al
as 2:2024mc00317
Plaintiff:
Seth E Pierce, Mary Pierce, Stephanie Zaffos and others
Defendant:
Jardine Construction Co, Jardine Construction Company LLC a Utah limited liability company doing business as JC Luxury Homes and Doug Jardine
Tom v. Forbes & York Insurance LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
David Tom
Defendant:
Forbes & York Insurance LLC doing business as MedAdvantage Partners and Assurance Pivot, LLC, The doing business as SkyBridge Leads
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
