Tenth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 993
Rodriguez et al v. Pro-Health, LLC
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Atilano Rodriguez, Onofre Valencia Gonzalez and Azucena Martinez Pahua
Defendant:
Pro-Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 - Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
Ebersole v. Dillon Companies LLC
as 1:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Kacey Ebersole
Defendant:
Dillon Companies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Hamilton v. Amazon.com Services
as 23-1082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL HAMILTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
West v. Strike Tax Advisory LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Danielle West
Defendant:
Strike Tax Advisory LLC and Jonathan Cardella
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Riebold v. FleetPride Inc
as 5:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Kelley Riebold
Defendant:
Fleetpride Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Wheeler v. Kansas Department of Labor
as 6:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
Damon Lamont Wheeler
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schubert v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
as 1:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Robert Schubert
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Rietheimer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Brandon Rietheimer
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Padilla v. Wanzek Construction, Inc
as 1:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Joseph Padilla
Defendant:
Wanzek Construction, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment and Retaining Notification Act
Troncoso v. Enterprise Products Operating LLC
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Justin Troncoso
Defendant:
Enterprise Products Operating LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
