US District Court for the Middle District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 21,449
Davis v. Weiss et al
as 6:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Semiya-Tahira Davis
Defendant:
Judge Kevin B Weiss, Rona Weiss, Shira Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Palm Bay Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Johnson
Defendant:
Palm Bay Police Department, Agent Tony Williams, Officer Breet Naymik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rentals First, LLC et al v. Garmon et al
as 8:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Rentals First, LLC and McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold Elliott Grimaldi Guito & Matthews, P.A.
Defendant:
Stephanie Garmon and Luis Ostolaza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Larrazabal v. Centerwell Health Services (USA), LLC
as 6:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Michael Larrazabal
Defendant:
Centerwell Health Services (USA), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gomez v. Kaur et al
as 8:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
Sudeep Kaur, NYS Child Support Processing Center and Silbana Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Marie Smith f/k/a Marie Ventura
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
