US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 92
FEAGIN et al v. CREDIT CONTROL LLC
as 3:2011cv00190
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH D FEAGIN and WILLIE C FEAGIN
Defendant:
CREDIT CONTROL LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MAY v. SCOTT
as 4:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MAY
Defendant:
RICHARD L SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
STUDENROTH v. GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 3:2010cv00514
Plaintiff:
KARL R STUDENROTH
Defendant:
GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
P.R.A. et al v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
as 4:2010cv00414
Plaintiff:
P.R.A. , Amy Griswold , BADO PYKO and others
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE INC v BROWNING, et al
as 1:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
National Organization for Marriage, Inc.
Defendant:
DAWN K ROBERTS, JORGE L CRUZ-BUSTILLO, WILLIAM H HOLLIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SCOTT v. ROBERTS
as 4:2010cv00283
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L SCOTT
Defendant:
DAWN K ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIMONT & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. SINK
as 4:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
DIMONT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
ALEX SINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BROWN v. DUNPHY
as 4:2009cv00455
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
FREDRICK B DUNPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al
as 1:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
JACKIE MICHAEL BELL
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LOCKE et al v. SHORE et al
as 4:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
EVA LOCKE, PATRICIA ANNE LEVENSON, BARBARA VANDERKOLK GARDNER and others
Defendant:
JOYCE SHORE, JOHN P. EHRIG, AIDA BAO-GARCIGA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
