Georgia Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Douglas Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. Berkley Surety Group, LLC.
as 5:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
Douglas Asphalt Paving, Inc.
Defendant:
Berkley Surety Group, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baxley Sewing Company, LLC v. Rockmount Ranchwear Manufacturing Company
as 2:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
Baxley Sewing Company, LLC
Defendant:
Rockmount Ranchwear Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Four Winds Manufacturing, LLC v. Isotec International, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00915
Plaintiff:
Four Winds Manufacturing, LLC
Defendant:
Isotec International, Inc.
FPC Financial, f.s.b. v. Barber Fertilizer Company et al
as 1:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
FPC Financial, f.s.b., FPC Financial, f.s.b. and FPC Financial, f.s.b.
Defendant:
Barber Fertilizer Company, Donald Barber and Ronald Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Optima Chemical Group, LLC v. Ashland, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Optima Chemical Group, LLC and Optima Chemical Group, LLC
Defendant:
Ashland, Inc. and Ashland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Barnes et al v. Avent America, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02876
Plaintiff:
Angela Barnes, Angela Barnes, Megan Dye and others
Defendant:
Avent America, Inc., Philips Electronic North America Corporation, Evenflo Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
G&G TIC, LLC v. Alabama Controls, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00162
Plaintiff:
G&G TIC, LLC and G&G TIC, LLC
Defendant:
Alabama Controls, Inc., Shaw Infrastructures, Inc., TAC Americas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gibbs Patrick Farms, Inc. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 7:2006cv00048
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carbo Ceramics, Inc. et al v. Hosokawa Alpine Aktiengesellschaft & Co. OHG et al
as 5:2006cv00165
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
