D.C. Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 125
ORLICK v. GRAND FORKS HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. ORLICK
Defendant:
GRAND FORKS HOUSING AUTHORITY, HOMESTEAD PLACE, INC., TERRY HANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
COOPER v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.
as 1:2013cv01975
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COOPER
Defendant:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HIRANI v. AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC
as 1:2013cv01579
Plaintiff:
SHAFIQ HIRANI
Defendant:
AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Angelene Hardaway, et al v. District of Columbia Housing
as 13-7138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angelene Hardaway and Lena Hardaway
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia Housing Authority
HARDAWAY et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
as 1:2013cv01232
Plaintiff:
ANGELENE HARDAWAY and LENA HARDAWAY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER v. PATRIOT REALTY et al
as 1:2013cv00653
Plaintiff:
EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER
Defendant:
PATRIOT REALTY and HUNTWOOD PRESERVATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
WILLIAMS v. DONOVAN
as 1:2012cv01930
Plaintiff:
YVETTE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SHAUN DONOVAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
YOUNG v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD et al
as 1:2012cv01512
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S. YOUNG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD and THOMAS P. REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: Violation of Congressional Accountability Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 1:2012cv01150
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SANTOS v. TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE
as 1:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
MARCELA S. SANTOS
Defendant:
TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
