D.C. Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 12,366
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5087
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
LEMIEUX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHITE HOUSE
as 1:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DANIEL LEMIEUX
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHITE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darryl Carter v. James Comer
as 24-5085
Plaintiff:
Darryl Chadwich Carter
Defendant:
James Comer, Chair, House Committee on Oversight and Accountability/Reform
VALENTINE v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
THOMAS VALENTINE
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, GEORGE WASHINGTON MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCIATES and UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JEAN-BAPTISTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
PARKER v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY PARKER
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ROBERT CONTEE, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
