US District Court for the District of Columbia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 313
DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv01862
Plaintiff:
DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
GHARB v. UNITRONICS 1989 R G LTD. et al
as 1:2010cv01847
Plaintiff:
SAMY GHARB
Defendant:
UNITRONICS 1989 R G LTD., HAIM SHANI, BAREKET SHANI and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. v. ABBOTT GMBH & CO. KG
as 1:2010cv01836
Plaintiff:
YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
Defendant:
ABBOTT GMBH & CO. KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
GHARB v. CITY OF HOBOKEN et al
as 1:2010cv01845
Plaintiff:
SAMY GHARB
Defendant:
CITY OF HOBOKEN, UNITRONICS 1989 R G LTD., BAREKET SHANI and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
SANDOZ INC. v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM
as 1:2010cv01767
Plaintiff:
SANDOZ INC.
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ALBERTS v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv01727
Plaintiff:
AUDREY M. ALBERTS
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
ASTRAZENECA AB v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv01676
Plaintiff:
ASTRAZENECA AB
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
ANCHEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. LABOPHARM INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01637
Plaintiff:
ANCHEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
LABOPHARM INC., LABOPHARM EUROPE, LTD. and LABOPHARM (BARBADOS), LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS, S.A. v. NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS SRL et al
as 1:2010cv01620
Plaintiff:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS, S.A.
Defendant:
NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS SRL and NOVARTIS AG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. v. ABBOTT GMBH & CO. KG
as 1:2010cv01518
Plaintiff:
YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
Defendant:
ABBOTT GMBH & CO. KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
