US District Court for the District of Columbia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 313
TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD. v. NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD.
Defendant:
NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC. and NINTENDO CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD. v. APPLE, INC.
as 1:2012cv00402
Plaintiff:
TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD.
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD. v. GOOGLE, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00404
Defendant:
YOUTUBE, LLC and GOOGLE, INC.
Plaintiff:
TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
WING POW INTERNATIONAL CORP., v. KNYRIM et al
as 1:2012cv00386
Plaintiff:
WING POW INTERNATIONAL CORP.,
Defendant:
JORG KNYRIM and DOES 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
HEMPHILL v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON
as 1:2012cv00279
Plaintiff:
ALLEGRA HEMPHILL
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PANCHEV et al v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
as 1:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR PANCHEV, MARIETA PANCHEVA and ADELINA PANCHEVA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
PEXCOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. UPONOR ABB
as 1:2011cv02034
Plaintiff:
PEXCOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
UPONOR AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
JOHNSTON v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv01973
Plaintiff:
SCOTT JOHNSTON
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD v. OBAYASHI SEIKOU CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2011cv01637
Plaintiff:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD
Defendant:
OBAYASHI SEIKOU CO., LTD., NAOTO HIROTA and SAKAE TANAKA
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
NOVARTIS AG et al v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA et al
as 1:2011cv01631
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS AG and NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Defendant:
ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA and INTAS PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
