District of Columbia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 528
TYLER v. UNITED STATES ARMY et al
as 1:2021cv02494
Plaintiff:
THYRIS TYLER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, LUAN MAI and UNITED STATES ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
DEAKIN et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2021cv02456
Plaintiff:
REBECCA CLAIRE DEAKIN, JESS LOKER and MARK LOKER
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and STEPHANIE SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
MITCHELL v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2021cv01577
Not Classified By Court:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mitchell
COLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01501
Plaintiff:
William Coley
Not Classified By Court:
MERRICK GARLAND, Brian Hudak and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
SANCHEZ v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01208
Defendant:
LYFT, INC., SAMUEL KENDRICK, DAVID MIHALIC and others
Plaintiff:
VERONICA SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2021cv01202
Plaintiff:
TAURUS DEMOND TAYLOR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
DANA JOHNSON v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00821
Defendant:
CRAIG CHERVERT LONG, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC
Plaintiff:
DANA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE JESUS HART v. NAFEES et al
as 1:2021cv00686
Defendant:
Zara LLC, Ibrahim Nafees and ZARA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rode De Jesus Hart and RODE ESTELA DE JESUS HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER, JR. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
LENNIE C. WALKER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
WEHMEIR v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00347
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY WEHMEIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
