Federal Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,825
Natera, Inc. v. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
NATERA, INC.
Defendant:
NEOGENOMICS LABORATORIES, INC.
Natera, Inc. v. ArcherDX, Inc.
as 24-1287
Plaintiff:
NATERA, INC.
Defendant:
ARCHERDX, INC., ARCHERDX, LLC and INVITAE CORPORATION
Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc.
as 24-1282
Plaintiff:
HELMERICH & PAYNE INTERNATIONAL DRILLING CO., HELMERICH & PAYNE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and MOTIVE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
NABORS DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
SurgeTech, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 24-1280
Plaintiff:
SURGETECH, LLC
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., dba Uber
Group One Ltd. v. GTE GmbH
as 24-1273
Plaintiff:
GROUP ONE LTD.
Defendant:
GTE GMBH and RALF WEIGEL, in his corporate capacity as Owner of GTE and in his individual capacity
Respondent:
UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Inventist Inc. v. Ninebot Inc. (USA)
as 24-1267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INVENTIST INC. and SHANE CHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
NINEBOT INC. (USA), dba Ninebot US Inc., NINEBOT (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and NINEBOT INC. (CHINA)
Epistar Corporation v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
EPISTAR CORPORATION
Defendant:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Winfrey v. US Department of Commerce
as 24-1260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EULA WINFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Patent and Trademark Office
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Coca-Cola Company
as 24-1253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROTHSCHILD CONNECTED DEVICES INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
COCA-COLA COMPANY
Trustees of Columbia University v. Gen Digital Inc.
as 24-1243
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Defendant / Appellant:
GEN DIGITAL INC., fka Symantec Corporation, fka NortonLifeLock, Inc.
Appellant:
QUINN EMANUEL LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
