Federal Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 44,032
SIVLEY & TOOGOOD, DDS v. USA
as 1:2025cv00713
Plaintiff:
SIVLEY & TOOGOOD, DDS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MCKEON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00712
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH MCKEON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
PARTIDA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00698
Petitioner:
SANDRA PARTIDA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MATZEK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00699
Petitioner:
SHARON MATZEK
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
GRAIL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00701
Petitioner:
JOSHUA GRAIL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MCKINNON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00702
Petitioner:
HEATHER MCKINNON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
STOERKEL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00703
Petitioner:
CANDEZ STOERKEL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
GILLES et al v. USA
as 1:2025cv00697
Plaintiff:
JEAN GILLES and ORCHID COMMUNITY LIVING, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Princess Awesome, LLC et al v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 1:2025cv00078
Plaintiff:
Princess Awesome, LLC, Stonemaier, LLC, 300 Below, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, Peter R. Flores, Acting Commissioner for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
