Federal Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 9 of 9
US Inventor, Inc. v. PTO
as 24-1396
Plaintiff:
US INVENTOR, INC. and NATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS UNITED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. v. PTO
as 23-2390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Brandenburg v. U.S. Department of State
as 23-2259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEOPOLD ROMAN BRANDENBURG, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corp. v. Vidal
as 23-2077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ODYSSEY LOGISTICS & TECHNOLOGY CORP.
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. PTO
as 21-2324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREI IANCU, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Hyatt v. PTO
as 21-1708
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
