U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 233
Sara Designs, Inc. v. A Classic Time Watch Co. Inc.
as 18-497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sara Designs, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
A Classic Time Watch Co. Inc. and New York & Company, Inc.
Nobile v. Watts
as 17-3752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Nobile
Defendant - Appellee:
Margot Louise Watts, AKA M.L. Stedman, Simon & Schuster, Inc., DreamWorks II Development Company, LLC and others
Ennio Moricone Music Inc. v. Bixio Music Group Ltd.
as 17-3595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ennio Moricone Music Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Bixio Music Group Ltd.
Dickerson v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios In
as 17-3280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Dickerson, AKA JD Lawrence
Defendant - Appellee:
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc., Showtime Networks, Inc and WB Studio Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Time Warner, Inc. and Warner Brothers Pictures
Lombardo v. Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P.
as 17-2952
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew Lombardo and Who's Holiday Limited Liability Company
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P.
Schleifer v. Berns
as 17-2972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ian Schleifer
Defendant - Appellee:
Kittee Berns
Lopez v. BigCommerce, Inc
as 17-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert G. Lopez
Defendant - Appellee:
Bigcommerce, Inc and Google, Inc.
Walker, Jr. v. Carter
as 17-2574
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dwayne D. Walker, Jr. and Gregory Berry
Defendant:
Kareem Burke, "Biggs"
Defendant - Appellant:
Shawn Carter, "Jay-Z", Damon Dash, "Dame", Universal Music Group, Inc. and others
Walker , Jr. v. Carter
as 17-2483
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Dwayne D. Walker, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Kareem Burke, "Biggs"
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Shawn Carter, "Jay-Z", Damon Dash, "Dame", Universal Music Group, Inc. and others
Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Gregory Berry
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
