Second Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 28,102
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2025cv00423
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 6:2025cv06259
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 6:2025cv06260
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Tru Kids Inc. v. Vape R Us, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv00781
Plaintiff:
Tru Kids Inc.
Defendant:
Vape R Us, Inc. and Ashraf Rayshani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Cannon v. Cvent, Inc.
as 1:2025cv04035
Plaintiff:
Bill Cannon
Defendant:
Cvent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
The Estate of Chi Modu et al v. Univision Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv04070
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Chi Modu and Dana Ruth Lixenberg
Defendant:
Univision Communications, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Graylock v. Guardian News & Media LLC
as 1:2025cv04008
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Graylock
Defendant:
Guardian News & Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Quinn v. Guardian News & Media LLC
as 1:2025cv04011
Plaintiff:
Edmund A. Quinn
Defendant:
Guardian News & Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al

as 1:2025cv04005
Plaintiff:
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Nitro Manufacturing, LLC v. Schmidty Racing Suspensions, LLC
as 1:2025cv00415
Plaintiff:
Nitro Manufacturing, LLC d/b/a Nitro Racing Parts
Defendant:
Schmidty Racing Suspensions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.