Second Circuit Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 8,367
Jones v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00962
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Elmer A. Jones
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00963
Plaintiff: Tyrone L. Jones
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Wry v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00948
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Kelly Wry
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
rivers v. Saul
as 1:2020cv05246
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: roderick rivers
Cause Of Action: Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Enderes v. Saul
as 7:2020cv05224
Plaintiff: Enderes Jeanmarie
Defendant: Saul Andrew
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
Fabian v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv05177
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Candida Fabian
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Kelly v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00934
Plaintiff: Kendrix Paul Kelly
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Willis v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00921
Plaintiff: Willis Antoinette
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: Social Security
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Gurmohamed v. Saul
as 1:2020cv02966
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Shelanie Gurmohamed
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROLON v. Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05109
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: ERNESTO ROLON
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?