Second Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 969
Bolduc v. Gogotech II LLC
as 1:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alex Bolduc and Alex Bolduc
Defendant:
Gogotech II LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Maurancy v. Preferred Home Care of New York
as 1:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Ermithe Maurancy
Defendant:
Preferred Home Care of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Perez v. Northwell Health, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Perez
Defendant:
Northwell Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Larosa et al v. Lisa Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Steven Larosa and Zainule Hanif
Defendant:
Lisa Management, Inc., Emerge Associates LLC. and Ryan Archer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Desiderio v. Hudson Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00541
Defendant:
Hudson Technologies, Inc. and Brian Coleman
Plaintiff:
Staryl Desiderio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 FMLA: Leave Requirements
Sgambato v. Shipman & Goodwin, LLP
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Heli Sgambato
Defendant:
Shipman & Goodwin, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Orrico v. Amphenol Corporation
as 3:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Diane Orrico
Defendant:
Amphenol Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
Blake v. Recovery Network of Programs, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Tammy Blake
Defendant:
Recovery Network of Programs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
KRIEGER v. Thuro Metal Products, Inc.
as 0:2021cv07043
Plaintiff:
LOUIS KRIEGER
Defendant:
Thuro Metal Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Krieger v. Thuro Metal Products, Inc.
as 2:2021cv07043
Plaintiff:
Louis Krieger
Defendant:
Thuro Metal Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
