Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,043
Cicchiello v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv01240
Defendant: Mail Room Staff, Danbury Federal Institute, S. Moore and others
Plaintiff: Joan Cicchiello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Does et al
as 3:2024cv01205
Defendant: Reis, Jane Doe, Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff: Chywon Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Douglas
as 3:2024cv01172
Defendant: Stanford Douglas
Plaintiff: Marcus Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pires v. Gallagher et al
as 3:2024cv01168
Plaintiff: Michael D. Pires, Sr.
Defendant: Oles, Colleen Gallagher, Jennifer Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Wright et al
as 3:2024cv01166
Defendant: D.A. Rodriguez, Jackson, John Doe and others
Plaintiff: Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greenwood v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv01116
Plaintiff: Joshua Greenwood
Defendant: State of Connecticut, Angel Quiros and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serrano v. Reynoso et al
as 3:2024cv01092
Plaintiff: Martin Serrano
Defendant: Reynoso, St. Jean and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Bridgeport County Jail
as 3:2024cv01063
Plaintiff: Christopher L. Boyd
Defendant: Bridgeport County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desire v. Guadarrama et al
as 3:2024cv01062
Plaintiff: Erika Amber-Marie Desire
Defendant: Guadarrama, Dow and Siena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinh v. Doe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01042
Plaintiff: Truong Jason Dinh
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?