New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 20,156
Rifenburg v. Heimer et al
as 9:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Alex Rifenburg
Defendant:
Antonia Heimer and Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vreeland v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Elijah Q. Vreeland
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, Dep Rapp, Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Fulton County Police Department
as 1:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Fulton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02906
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Long Tuminello, LLP et al
as 2:2024cv02853
Plaintiff:
Elmer Garcia
Defendant:
Long Tuminello, LLP, Richard I. Horowitz and Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02897
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Browne v. Zebro et al
as 1:2024cv02781
Plaintiff:
Kendall Browne
Defendant:
P.O. James J. Zebro, P.O. Mark P. Shackel, P.O. Anthony P. Guidice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hickman v. A.C.C./A.S.P.C.A. et al
as 1:2024cv02825
Plaintiff:
Quandell Hickman
Defendant:
A.C.C./A.S.P.C.A., Jaylen and Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
