US District Court for the District of Delaware Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,151
Chrustowski v. Best Buy
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
Best Buy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Georgetown Police Department
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Hawkins
Defendant:
Georgetown Police Department and State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hawkins v. Family Court et al
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Hawkins
Defendant:
Family Court and State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hawkins v. Delaware State Police et al
as 1:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Hawkins
Defendant:
Delaware State Police and State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nasir v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2023cv01398
Plaintiff:
Malik Nasir
Defendant:
State of Delaware, John W. Donahue, Judge Andrea M. Freud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Happle v. Wubbenhorst et al
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Andrew Wubbenhorst, Kim Kassar and Criger's Towing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. D'Angelo
as 1:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Dana D'Angelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. John
as 1:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Judge John Paparrazzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
C. P. Wilson and M. Staton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Windell v. Frazier
as 1:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Shane Windell
Defendant:
Larry Frazier, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
