District Court Cases in Delaware

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 30,817
Korber Supply Chain US, Inc. v. Dot Holdings Co.
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff: Korber Supply Chain US, Inc.
Defendant: Dot Holdings Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dropkin v. Blair et al
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff: Stuart Dropkin
Defendant: Rainer M. Blair, Matt McGrew, Emmanuel Ligner and others
Jones v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff: Darlene Jones
Defendant: Jagdeep Singh, Timonthy Holme, Kevin Hettrich and others
Tiwaz v. Hanna et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff: Sir Tiwaz, Cea Gleanbead Mai, Cea G. Mai and others
Defendant: Adrienne M. Hanna, Cerisini, Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC v. Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00226
Defendant: Bread Financial Holdings, Inc., Alliance Data Systems Corporation, Joseph L. Motes III and others
Plaintiff: Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Bindes v. Boyer
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff: Marcie Bindes
Defendant: Barbara Boyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Teman v. Infused Innovations, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: Kevin R. Teman doing business as Artificially Intelligent Matchmaker
Defendant: Infused Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Coleman v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner: Devin L. Coleman
Respondent: Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roy v. Russell et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff: Anand Roy
Defendant: Mark A. Russell, Michael Lohscheller, Stephen J. Girsky and others
Wang v. deSouza et al
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Defendant: Francis A. deSouza, Sam A. Samad, Jay Flatley and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?