New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 6,713
HIMMELREICH v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Petitioner:
WALTER HIMMELREICH
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON and K. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHASE v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
WESLEY CHASE
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TACCETTA v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
MARTIN TACCETTA
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELM v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
FRED ELM
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON and C. PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAZA v. TAYLOR
as 1:2024cv00354
Petitioner:
SAJID RAZA
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DRAVES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
THOMAS DRAVES
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and NJ STATE PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CALLAWAY v. WARDEN, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
OREADER CALLAWAY
Respondent:
WARDEN, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JUSTO v. Warden FCI Fort Dix
as 2:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
Warden FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JUSTO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Respondent:
STEPHANIE THOMPSON and RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
