New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 18,911
Bynum v. State of New Jersey
as 2:2024cv01720
Petitioner:
Felicia Bynum
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANCHEZ v. GRELLA
as 2:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
NICHOLAS GRELLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY and ESSEX COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
K. BULLOCK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETRONGLO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD PETRONGLO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANCHEZ v. PRADIHANANG
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
LILIBETH PRADIHANANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KWASNIK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01363
Petitioner:
MICHAEL W. KWASNIK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FITZGERALD v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv01441
Petitioner:
DAWUD FITZGERALD
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and MATTHEW PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BILLIP v. THE NEW JERSEY CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE AT UMD et al
as 2:2024cv01438
Plaintiff:
LAMELLE LEE BILLIP
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE AT UMD, UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE & DENTISTRY OF NJ, NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. PRADHANANG
as 2:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
DR. LILIBETH PRADHANANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
