US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 5,527
TAYLOR v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03664
Plaintiff:
LUCRECIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BULLARD v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03644
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD, JR.
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ADAMS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03643
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ADAMS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CARR v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03645
Plaintiff:
RHODA CARR
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WILLIAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv03623
Plaintiff:
ELENA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TORRES-GONZALEZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03604
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO TORRES-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SAEZ v. Kilolo
as 2:2023cv03576
Plaintiff:
BLANCA SAEZ
Defendant:
Kijakazi Kilolo and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SMEDLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2023cv03517
Plaintiff:
HEATHER SMEDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WIJTYSZYN v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03518
Plaintiff:
AMY B. WIJTYSZYN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smedley v. Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv03517
Plaintiff:
Heather Smedley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
