US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 143
TAYLOR et al v. PEST CONTROL TECHNICIANS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05162
Plaintiff:
JAMES TAYLOR , WINIFERE THORNTON and CAMILLE THORNTON
Defendant:
PEST CONTROL TECHNICIANS, INC. and JAMES STANLEY COUGHLIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRUITT v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02581
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER MAE PRUITT
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEWALT v. GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
as 5:2015cv00708
Plaintiff:
CLAY DEWALT
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RIDEOUT v. TAKATA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv07000
Plaintiff:
DEVON RIDEOUT
Defendant:
TAKATA CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, INC., HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALL v. SHOVER
as 2:2014cv06661
Plaintiff:
ROBIN BALL
Defendant:
CARLA SHOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SABOL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2014cv06654
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SABOL
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Petitioner:
GEORGE SABOL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
VUKADINOVIC v. TAKATA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv06648
Plaintiff:
MICKEY VUKADINOVIC
Defendant:
TAKATA CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, INC., HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHAFLE et al v. TAKATA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv06628
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHAFLE, SIAN SCHAFLE, TED PEPIN and others
Defendant:
TAKATA CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, INC., HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
POTTS et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
as 2:2014cv04849
Plaintiff:
TERESA POTTS and EDWARD RUMFORD
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC
as 2:2014cv03891
Plaintiff:
GARY WILLIAMS and NINA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
