US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,651
PITTS v. WILLIS TOWERS WATSON US LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02951
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Pitts
Defendant:
WILLIS TOWERS WATSON US LLC and EXTEND HEALTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KELLY et al v. J&J SERVICE SOLUTIONS LLC
as 2:2023cv02854
Plaintiff:
JOHN KELLY, QUENTIN MONDAY and RANIQUE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
J&J SERVICE SOLUTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GOMEZ v. CLAIRES, INC.
as 2:2023cv02807
Plaintiff:
BECKI GOMEZ
Defendant:
CLAIRES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RICHARDS et al v. EDUCATION WORKS INC.
as 2:2023cv02809
Plaintiff:
SOLEDAD RICHARDS and KENYA BALDWIN
Defendant:
EDUCATION WORKS INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SU v. BYUN BROTHERS SALES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02720
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
BYUN BROTHERS SALES, INC. doing business as B&B SALES and RICHARD BYUN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JONES v. SOLID WASTE SERVICES, INC.
as 5:2023cv02648
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER JONES
Defendant:
SOLID WASTE SERVICES, INC. doing business as J.P. MASCARO & SONS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MATIAS v. ASHA KO KIRAN HOMECARE, LLC
as 2:2023cv02631
Plaintiff:
MARIA MATIAS
Defendant:
ASHA KO KIRAN HOMECARE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
OKOKURO v. APEX HUMAN SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
OYAKIMIGBIA OKOKURO
Defendant:
APEX HUMAN SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
DYSON v. KIEFFER'S APPLIANCES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE DYSON
Defendant:
KIEFFER'S APPLIANCES, INC. doing business as KIEFFER'S APPLIANCES, JOHN KIEFFER, JACE KIEFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
