Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 7,054
CLINKSCALE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
CECILIA A. CLINKSCALE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ramirez v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
MS. MARIELENA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fernandez v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Gino A. Fernandez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BIGLEY v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY BIGLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kralick v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Mr. Steven Kralick
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Laboy Gonzalez v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Mr Kervin Javier Laboy Gonzalez
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Russell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Virginia Ellen Russell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GRIGGS v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
ZENOBIA GRIGGS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
AMADORO v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
ANNA AMADORO
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bohr v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Brian Robert Bohr
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
