Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27,671
PATTERSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04614
Plaintiff:
LYNN PATTERSON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEARY v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04621
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN LEARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FURLONG v. BEST BUY CO., INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04544
Defendant:
ALLSTART INNOVATIONS, BEST BUY CO., INC. and SWFT EMOBILITY
Plaintiff:
JAMES FURLONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
LARSEN v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04551
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID LARSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRIFFITH v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04557
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STOVER v. NOVO NORDISK, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04590
Plaintiff:
THOMAS R. STOVER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEST v. NOVO NORDISK, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04508
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
SHEREE BEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TINSLEY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S
as 2:2024cv04510
Plaintiff:
KARETHA TINSLEY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GROOMS v. QVC, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04428
Defendant:
SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC. and QVC, INC. doing business as Cook's Essentials
Plaintiff:
TERESA GROOMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BALSAMO v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04426
Plaintiff:
CINDY BALSAMO
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
