Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,349
Jackson v. NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04598
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
Estate of Rebecca Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ONEILL v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04602
Plaintiff:
BRDGET WILTSHIRE ONEILL
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WEEKS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04606
Plaintiff:
DAVID WEEKS
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BUTLER v. NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04607
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL BUTLER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TURNER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04608
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
KENYA TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pitts v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04609
Plaintiff:
Sherry Pitts
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04611
Plaintiff:
HEATHER SMITH
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RECTOR v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04612
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
JIMMY RECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRELLA v. NOVO NORDISK, INC.
as 2:2024cv04613
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Plaintiff:
WENDY J.F GRELLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAPANTONAKIS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04615
Plaintiff:
STELLA PAPANTONAKIS
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
