U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,136
Robert Weddington v. Central Express, LLC
as 24-1297
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CLIFFORD WEDDINGTON
Defendant:
CENTRAL EXPRESS, LLC, NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Emily Wright v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 24-1291
Plaintiff:
EMILY WRIGHT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, TIFFANY WILSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, KRISHNENDU CHAKRABORTY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. and CAPITAL ONE N.A.
Bryan Yancey v. Fulton Financial Corporation
as 24-1260
Plaintiff:
BRYAN YANCEY
Defendant:
FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
John Floyd v. City of Spartanburg
as 24-1255
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. FLOYD and GORDON FARMS, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
CITY OF SPARTANBURG
Colonial Webb Contractors Company v. Hill Phoenix, Inc.
as 24-1237
Plaintiff:
COLONIAL WEBB CONTRACTORS COMPANY
Defendant:
HILL PHOENIX, INC.
Barbara Burger v. Health Care Management Solutions, LLC
as 24-1180
Plaintiff:
BARBARA REYNOLDS BURGER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC and ASRC FEDERAL DATA SOLUTIONS, LLC
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. RDFS, LLC
as 24-1159
Plaintiff:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC
Defendant:
RDFS, LLC, a temporary easement to operate and maintain a natural gas transmission line across 1.46 acres of property in Wetzel County, West Virginia, (Parcel ID No. and UNKNOWN PERSONS AND INTERESTED PARTIES
Cross Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Merl Code v. adidas America, Incorporated
as 24-1143
Plaintiff:
MERL CODE
Defendant:
ADIDAS AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Bryan Yancey v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 24-1129
Plaintiff:
BRYAN YANCEY
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
