Maryland Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Visual Language Interpreting Inc. v. Weinterpret.Net et al
as 1:2007cv02775
Plaintiff:
Visual Language Interpreting Inc.
Defendant:
Weinterpret.Net, David Isaacs Stephenson, Angela K. Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Raymar Information Technology, Inc. v. Data Connect Enterprise et al
as 8:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
Raymar Information Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Data Connect Enterprise and Barry G. Patton
Counter Claimant:
Data Connect Enterprise and Barry G. Patton
Counter Defendant:
Raymar Information Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
CDR Associates LLC v. Kuciauskas
as 1:2007cv00758
Plaintiff:
CDR Associates LLC and CDR Associates LLC
Defendant:
Saul P. Kuciauskas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00325
Plaintiff:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC, AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC, AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and others
Defendant:
James T. Smith, Jr., James T. Smith, Jr., William J. Wiseman, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Home Selling Assistance, Inc. v. Advance Realty, Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv03397
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AT&T Corporation v. Office Suites of CenterPark, Inc.
as 8:2006cv02620
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2006cv02478
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Radcliffe Partners, LLC v. Con-Way Inc.
as 1:2006cv02355
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Estes Express Lines v. Air Clear, LLC
as 1:2006cv01751
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Corey et al v. Florida Van Lines
as 8:2006cv01166
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
