US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Real Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Patterson v. Medtronic Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00196
Plaintiff:
Margaret B Patterson
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Averitte v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 4:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Angela Averitte
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Averitte v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 5:2009cv00493
Plaintiff:
Angela Averitte
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Stoddard v. PLIVA, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00173
Plaintiff:
Gary Joseph Stoddard and Patricia Ann Stoddard
Defendant:
Wyeth, Inc., Schwarz Pharma, Inc. and PLIVA USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smith, et al v. Larson Boats
as 5:2008cv00484
Defendant:
Larson Boats
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith and Colleen Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tara Pitts et al v. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
as 7:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
Tara . Pitts
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nelson v. Davol, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Algia Nelson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Irving v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jack Irving
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Earp, et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 5:2006cv00350
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DeGrood v. QSL Corporation et al
as 7:2006cv00095
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
