North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,163
BURROUGHS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
ELLA BURROUGHS
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edmundson v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Karla Edmundson
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Franklin County Board of Education v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Franklin County Board of Education
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Walker
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wren v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Willow Wren
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Malloy v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Melissa Malloy
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gillstrap v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Shea Gillstrap
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kunysz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Carley L. Kunysz
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Argiro et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Defendant:
John Argiro and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Argiro v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
John Argiro
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.