US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,084
Metz v. McCarthy
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Metz
Defendant:
Laurie McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wulfekuhle v. Ashford TRS Dulles LLC
as 1:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wulfekuhle
Defendant:
Ashford TRS Dulles LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cordray v. Petsmart LLC
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Laura E Cordray
Defendant:
Petsmart LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Keckley v. Blusea Holding, LLC
as 1:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Candi Keckley
Defendant:
Blusea Holding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Dutt v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Aditi Dutt
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dutt v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Aditi Dutt
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Llarenas v. Jacobs Technology, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jaime Llarenas
Defendant:
Jacobs Technology, Inc., Robert Rice, Thomas Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Goin v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Marvin Goin
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. and Moxie Equities Woodford Square, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wang v. CCRM Fertility of Northern Virginia
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Zhongan Wang
Defendant:
CCRM Fertility of Northern Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Holt v. Hull et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Warren Holt
Defendant:
Ted Hull, Jessica Middlebrook and Hannah Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
