Virginia Contract Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Elliott et al v. Great Point Partners, LLC
as 1:2010cv01047
Plaintiff:
John Elliott and Laura Elliott
Defendant:
Great Point Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Great Point Partners, LLC v. Elliott
as 1:2010cv01019
Plaintiff:
Great Point Partners, LLC
Defendant:
John Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackrel v. ICX Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00941
Plaintiff:
Howard S. Jackrel
Defendant:
ICX Technologies, Inc., Hans C. Kobler, Colin J. Cumming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siegel v. Telos Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00740
Plaintiff:
Andrew Siegel
Defendant:
Telos Corporation, Doe I - XX and ROE corporations I - XX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meehan v. McKeon et al
as 1:2010cv00446
Plaintiff:
Kevin V. Meehan
Defendant:
Robert McKeon, William Ballhaus, Barry McCaffrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cohen v. Hillman et al
as 1:2010cv00237
Plaintiff:
Shuly Cohen
Defendant:
Lee Hillman, Peter Aquino, Jose Cecin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Beaumont v. U.S. Merchandising, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01188
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Beaumont
Defendant:
U.S. Merchandising, Inc. and Andrew M. Gibbon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hunter v. Messmer et al
as 1:2009cv01103
Plaintiff:
Margaret Hunter
Defendant:
Harold M. Messmer, Jr., M. Keith Waddell, Andrew S. Berwick, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
R.S. Bassman v. Syron et al
as 1:2008cv01247
Plaintiff:
R.S. Bassman
Defendant:
Richard F. Syron, Patricia L. Cook, Anthony S. Piszel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Terzenbach v. LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00757
Plaintiff:
Gary Terzenbach
Defendant:
LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc., Theodore Chandler, Marshall Wishnack and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
