Virginia Labor Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 1,794
Walsh v. Elite Home Health Care, Inc., et al.
as 2:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Department of Labor/Secretary of Labor and Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
Elite Home Health Care, Inc., Henry Jr. L Olds, Elite Home Health Care, Inc. doing business as Elite Home Health Care and others
Walsh v. Negril, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
Negril, Inc., Kirby Wright and Tammy Wright-Warren
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Munekiyo v. Transformation Health Services, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Sean Munekiyo
Defendant:
Transformation Health Services, LLC and Marcelli Pascal-Rodriguez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
U.S. Department of Labor v. Serenity Home Healthcare LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00803
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
Serenity Home Healthcare LLC, Serenity Home Healthcare - Norfolk LLC, Serenity Home Healthcare - Warrenton LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petersen v. DC Mechanical, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Patrick Petersen
Defendant:
DC Mechanical, LLC, DC Mechanical & Maintenance, LLC, Joel Blockowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fair Labor Standards Act
U.S. Department of Labor v. JAG Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
JAG Contractors, Inc., Josue Guzman and Carlos Gomez
King v. Sharp Holding, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Rhonda King
Defendant:
Sharp Holding, Inc., Robert B. Sharp and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mayes v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 2:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Amanda R Mayes
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Virginia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
