US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,336
Hopson v. Lauderdale County Sheriff Department
as 3:2023cv03144
Plaintiff:
Edward James Hopson
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Baur et al v. Peoples Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Sandra Baur and Baur Food Group, LLC
Defendant:
Peoples Bancshares, Inc. doing business as Peoples Bank and The Hartford Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riley v. PennyMac Loan Service, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Adrianyon Riley
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Service, LLC and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BluRoc, LLC et al v. Foberg et al
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
BluRoc, LLC and Yak Access, LLC
Defendant:
Benjamin Foberg, Justin Lavoie and John Does 1-15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
The Mississippi Bar v. Hessler
as 3:2023ad00006
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Eric John Hessler
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
