US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Zachary v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 2:2016cv00221
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Zachary
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Morgan v. Clark Gin Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00694
Plaintiff:
Robert Morgan
Defendant:
Clark Gin Service, Inc., Alvin W. Yeates, The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Miller v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company
as 2:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Mona Shea Miller
Defendant:
Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Thomas v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 1:2015cv00401
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Thomas
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Gales v. Natchez Railway, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Delvie Gales
Defendant:
Natchez Railway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Christian v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Scott Christian
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Pinkley v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
Justin Pinkley
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gordon v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
Wayne Gordon
Defendant:
Ellen Davis, Lori Jones, Labor Ready Southeast 1310 (790678AAG) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kansas City Southern RWY Company
as 3:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Williams
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern RWY Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammons v. Vanguard Industries of Michigan et al
as 3:2010cv00529
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hammons
Defendant:
Vanguard Industries of Michigan, Bechtel National, Inc. and Madison Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
