US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,064
Escamia et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Arckhangel U. Escamia and Bianca Trevino
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Harrell v. Webtpa Employer Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
David Harrell
Defendant:
Webtpa Employer Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sunisa v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Smallwood Sunisa
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Torres v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Jose Daniel Torres
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Florance v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
David C. Florance
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gullette et al v. WebTPA Employer Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
Belinda Gullette and Lawrence Burger
Defendant:
Webtpa Employer Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wood v. Webtpa Employer Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
Heavenle Wood
Defendant:
Webtpa Employer Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Head v. AT&T Inc.
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Stephen Head
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PNC Bank, National Association, as successor-in-interest to BBVA USA v. Yoo
as 3:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association, as successor-in-interest to BBVA USA
Defendant:
Danny Yoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ragland v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Vincent Ragland
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
