US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Torts - Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,589
Flores v. Loetzerich
as 7:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Robert R Flores
Defendant:
Derek Loetzerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Flores v. Berleth et al
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert R Flores
Defendant:
Robert W. Berleth, Berleth Robert, Heather Renee Slagle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Prince et al v. Jaworowski et al
as 4:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Wayman L Prince and JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A
Defendant:
Jeffrey Jaworowski, Marlon Willliams, Wade Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Rowe v. Doris et al
as 4:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Rowe
Defendant:
James A. Doris and Camber Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
EnFin Corp. v. Wells et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
EnFin Corp.
Defendant:
Carl Wells and Ferrin DeLoach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hunter v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
John Robert Hunter, Jr
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, N.A. and Freddie Mac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Petersen v. Meta, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Dr. John Emil Petersen
Defendant:
Meta, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Smith v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Robin Marie Smith
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Tyron Perry
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Taya Agricultural Feed Mill Co.
as 4:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Taya Agricultural Feed Mill Co.
Defendant:
Heritier Byishimo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
