US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 5,821
Avila v. Chavez
as 4:2023cv04004
Plaintiff:
Juvento Bravo Avila
Defendant:
Silvestre Chavez and Silvestre Chavez doing business as Brothers Construction Company
Garcia v. DS Lira and Sons, LLC
as 5:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mayra Garcia
Defendant:
DS Lira and Sons, LLC
Rios v. Meacham et al
as 4:2023cv03981
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rios
Defendant:
Susan Meacham and S & R Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Schanen v. Infocus Solutions, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03943
Plaintiff:
Kaya Schanen
Defendant:
Infocus Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Texas Medical Transportation, Inc. d/b/a Texas Medical Transportation
as 7:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Texas Medical Transportation, Inc. d/b/a Texas Medical Transportation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Hashmi v. Asad Businesses, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03801
Plaintiff:
Syed Nadeem Hashmi
Defendant:
Asad Businesses, Inc., Gessner & Creek Bend, LLC, 10619 South Gessner, LLC and others
Battaglia v. Blue Sprig Pediatrics, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03805
Plaintiff:
Joshua Battaglia
Defendant:
Blue Sprig Pediatrics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hernandez v. NES Global, LLC d/b/a NES Fircroft
as 4:2023cv03808
Plaintiff:
Cesar Hernandez
Defendant:
NES Global, LLC d/b/a NES Fircroft and NES Global, LLC doing business as NES Fircroft
Seaux v. Knight Energy Services, LLC
as 4:2023cv03773
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Seaux
Defendant:
Knight Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lee v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
as 4:2023cv03725
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
