US District Court for the Western District of Texas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 2,260
Whisler v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Jaycen Wayne Whisler
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Cruz v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Agustin Cruz
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rangel et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rangel and Melissa Rosales
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mendez v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Rita Lozano Mendez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rashduni v. P. VITI (COP1) et al
as 1:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
The People of of the State of New York
Defendant:
Claude Aram Rashduni
Counter Defendant:
P. VITI (COP1), Local Criminal Court State of NY, Greenburgh Town Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jureski v. General Motors, LLC
as 5:2023cv00887
Plaintiff:
Corbin Jureski
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Holub v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Steven Holub
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Arch v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Joaquinn Christopher Arch
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Parsons v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Parsons
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gardner v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Harold Dean Gardner
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
