U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 5,116
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Mark Blackwell v. Lisa Nocerini, et al
as 24-1186
Plaintiff:
MARK B. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
LISA NOCERINI, RYAN STRONG, FINLEY CARTER and others
Cynthia Lundeen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 24-3193
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA MAREK LUNDEEN
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
John/Jane Doe v. Springboro Community City School Dist Bd of Ed, et al
as 24-3183
Plaintiff:
JOHN/JANE DOE
Defendant:
SPRINGBORO COMMUNITY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION and JOHN AUSTIN HOPKINS
Donald Freed v. Michelle Thomas, et al
as 24-1170
Plaintiff:
DONALD FREED
Defendant:
MICHELLE THOMAS and GRATIOT COUNTY, MI
Intervenor:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kelsey Campbell v. Michelle Cordova
as 24-3175
Plaintiff:
KELSEY E. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHELLE L. CORDOVA
Lars St. John v. CMHA, et al
as 24-3172
Plaintiff:
LARS ST. JOHN
Defendant:
CUYAHOGA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY, OFFICER CORNELL GRIMES, Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Police Department and OFFICER TYSHAWN HARRIS, Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Police Department
Lars St. John v. CMHA, et al
as 24-3170
Plaintiff:
LARS ST. JOHN
Defendant:
CUYAHOGA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY, OFFICER CORNELL GRIMES, Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Police Department, OFFICER TYSHAWN HARRIS, Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Police Department and others
Kimberly Edelstein, et al v. Ann Flottman, et al
as 24-3169
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. EDELSTEIN, Individually and as parent on behalf of S. E. and S.E., a minor
Defendant:
ANN FLOTTMAN, Judge, Individually and in her Official Capacity, CRAIG WEBB, Magistrate, KIMBERLY KENT, Individually and in her Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
